After attending the Midwest farmers gathering , something has come to mind. The people making the guidelines for the homeopathic substances are not the sames as in the agricultural section, there seems to be a drift apart from what is mentioned in Agricultural Course, the knitted working together of the farmers and the circle of scientists.
It was also shown at the gathering how some of the tests that are being performed to evaluate the right potency is done away from life conditions. the mention to Kolisko to test the potencies with germination processes is a clear indication that life is to be tested by life, but some of our scientists follow this without taking into account that the environment is also very much influencing the outcome, and they use plastic petri capsules, artificial light and air, etc, to make it easy to control variability....I am interested in knowing if some of their results can be then compared with tests being done in a more living environment.
Because of that and because it is needed that the Agricultural Section move towards the farmer ( not necessarily the other way around), I am willing to put my effort in designing experiments in the farm, tests that would be be measuring life with life, yet able to create a language between farmers themselves and also with the agricultural section.
One of my first questions is: how the regional wild chamomille compares with the german chamomille?
No comments:
Post a Comment